docs/Single-server-VictoriaMetrics.md: mention that it is recommended upgrading to the latest release before reporting issues

This commit is contained in:
Aliaksandr Valialkin 2020-05-04 00:41:47 +03:00
parent 23010e6321
commit 6c68b8aa81
2 changed files with 8 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@ -907,11 +907,15 @@ The most interesting metrics are:
* `vm_free_disk_space_bytes` - free space left at `-storageDataPath`.
* `sum(vm_data_size_bytes)` - the total data size on disk.
### Troubleshooting
* It is recommended to use default command-line flag values (i.e. don't set them explicitly) until the need
of tweaking these flag values arises.
* It is recommended upgrading to the latest available release from [this page](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/releases),
since the issue could be already fixed there.
* If VictoriaMetrics works slowly and eats more than a CPU core per 100K ingested data points per second,
then it is likely you have too many active time series for the current amount of RAM.
It is recommended increasing the amount of RAM on the node with VictoriaMetrics in order to improve

View File

@ -907,11 +907,15 @@ The most interesting metrics are:
* `vm_free_disk_space_bytes` - free space left at `-storageDataPath`.
* `sum(vm_data_size_bytes)` - the total data size on disk.
### Troubleshooting
* It is recommended to use default command-line flag values (i.e. don't set them explicitly) until the need
of tweaking these flag values arises.
* It is recommended upgrading to the latest available release from [this page](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/releases),
since the issue could be already fixed there.
* If VictoriaMetrics works slowly and eats more than a CPU core per 100K ingested data points per second,
then it is likely you have too many active time series for the current amount of RAM.
It is recommended increasing the amount of RAM on the node with VictoriaMetrics in order to improve