docs/FAQ.md: add bullet comparison with Cortex and Thanos

This commit is contained in:
Aliaksandr Valialkin 2020-01-15 10:47:28 +02:00
parent 893b62c682
commit 7483deccca

View File

@ -54,11 +54,11 @@ Yes. Prometheus continues writing data to local storage after enabling remote st
and new data is available for querying via Prometheus as usual.
### How does VictoriaMetrics compare to other clustered TSDBs on top of Prometheus such as [M3 from Uber](https://eng.uber.com/m3/), [Thanos](https://github.com/improbable-eng/thanos), [Cortex](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex), etc.?
### How does VictoriaMetrics compare to other clustered TSDBs on top of Prometheus such as [M3 from Uber](https://eng.uber.com/m3/), [Thanos](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos), [Cortex](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex), etc.?
VictoriaMetrics is simpler, faster, more cost-effective and it provides [MetricsQL with useful extensions for PromQL](ExtendedPromQL). The simplicity is twofold:
- It is simpler to configure and operate. There is no need in configuring third-party [sidecars](https://github.com/improbable-eng/thanos/blob/master/docs/components/sidecar.md)
or fighting with [gossip protocol](https://github.com/improbable-eng/thanos/blob/master/docs/proposals/completed/201809_gossip-removal.md).
- It is simpler to configure and operate. There is no need in configuring third-party [sidecars](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/blob/master/docs/components/sidecar.md)
or fighting with [gossip protocol](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/blob/master/docs/proposals/completed/201809_gossip-removal.md).
- VictoriaMetrics has simpler architecture, which means less bugs and more useful features in the long run comparing to competing TSDBs.
See [comparing Thanos to VictoriaMetrics cluster](https://medium.com/@valyala/comparing-thanos-to-victoriametrics-cluster-b193bea1683)
@ -67,6 +67,45 @@ and [Remote Write Storage Wars](https://promcon.io/2019-munich/talks/remote-writ
VictoriaMetrics also [uses less RAM than Thanos components](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/issues/448).
### What is the difference between VictoriaMetrics and [Cortex](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex)?
VictoriaMetrics is similar to Cortex in the following aspects:
- Both systems accept data from Prometheus via standard [remote_write API](https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/remote_write/),
i.e. there is no need in running sidecars unlike in [Thanos](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos) case.
- Both systems support multi-tenancy out of the box. See [the corresponding docs for VictoriaMetrics](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/blob/cluster/README.md#url-format).
The main differences between Corex and VictoriaMetrics:
- Cortex re-uses Prometheus source code, while VictoriaMetrics is written from scratch.
- Cortex provides [Ruler](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex/blob/master/docs/architecture.md#ruler) and [Alertmanager](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex/blob/master/docs/architecture.md#alertmanager) components,
which are currently missing in VictoriaMetrics. However, these components can be substituted by [Promxy](https://github.com/jacksontj/promxy#how-do-i-use-alertingrecording-rules-in-promxy).
- Cortex heavily relies on third-party services such as Consul, Memcache, DynamoDB, BigTable, Cassandra, etc.
This may increase operational complexity and reduce system reliability comparing to VictoriaMetrics' case,
which doesn't use any external services. Compare [Cortex Architecture](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex/blob/master/docs/architecture.md)
to [VictoriaMetrics architecture](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/blob/cluster/README.md#architecture-overview).
- VictoriaMetrics provides [production-ready single-node solution](https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/blob/master/README.md),
which is much easier to setup and operate than Cortex cluster.
- Cortex may lose up to 12 hours of recent data on Ingestor failure - see [the corresponding docs](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex/blob/master/docs/architecture.md#ingesters-failure-and-data-loss).
VictoriaMetrics may lose only a few seconds of recent data, which isn't synced to persistent storage yet.
See [this article for details](https://medium.com/@valyala/wal-usage-looks-broken-in-modern-time-series-databases-b62a627ab704).
- Cortex is usually slower and requires more CPU and RAM than VictoriaMetrics. See [this talk from Adidas at PromCon 2019](https://promcon.io/2019-munich/talks/remote-write-storage-wars/).
### What is the difference between VictoriaMetrics and [Thanos](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos)?
- Thanos re-uses Prometheus source code, while VictoriaMetrics is written from scratch.
- Thanos provides [Ruler component](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/blob/master/docs/components/rule.md),
while VictoriaMetrics relies on [Promxy for alerting and recording rules](https://github.com/jacksontj/promxy#how-do-i-use-alertingrecording-rules-in-promxy).
- VictoriaMetrics accepts data via [standard remote_write API for Prometheus](https://prometheus.io/docs/practices/remote_write/),
while Thanos uses non-standard [Sidecar](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos/blob/master/docs/components/sidecar.md), which must run alongside each Prometheus instance.
- Thanos Sidecar requires disabling data compaction in Prometheus, which may hurt Prometheus performance and increase RAM usage.
- Thanos stores data on object storage (Amazon S3 or Google GCS), while VictoriaMetrics stores data on block storage (GCP persistent disks, Amazon EBS or bare metal HDD).
- Thanos may lose up to 2 hours of recent data, which wasn't uploaded yet to object storage. VictoriaMetrics may lose only a few seconds of recent data,
which isn't synced to persistent storage yet. See [this article for details](https://medium.com/@valyala/wal-usage-looks-broken-in-modern-time-series-databases-b62a627ab704).
- Thanos may be harder to setup and operate comparing to VictoriaMetrics, since it has more moving parts, which can be connected with less reliable networks.
See [this article for details](https://medium.com/faun/comparing-thanos-to-victoriametrics-cluster-b193bea1683).
- Thanos is usually slower and requires more CPU and RAM than VictoriaMetrics. See [this talk from Adidas at PromCon 2019](https://promcon.io/2019-munich/talks/remote-write-storage-wars/).
### How does VictoriaMetrics compare to [InfluxDB](https://www.influxdata.com/time-series-platform/influxdb/)?
VictoriaMetrics requires [10x less RAM](https://medium.com/@valyala/insert-benchmarks-with-inch-influxdb-vs-victoriametrics-e31a41ae2893) and it [works faster](https://medium.com/@valyala/measuring-vertical-scalability-for-time-series-databases-in-google-cloud-92550d78d8ae).
@ -79,12 +118,13 @@ TimescaleDB insists on using SQL as a query language. While SQL is more powerful
Additionally, VictoriaMetrics requires [up to 70x less storage space comparing to TimescaleDB](https://medium.com/@valyala/when-size-matters-benchmarking-victoriametrics-vs-timescale-and-influxdb-6035811952d4) for storing the same amount of time series data.
### Does VictoriaMetrics use Prometheus technologies like other clustered TSDBs built on top of Prometheus such as [M3 from Uber](https://eng.uber.com/m3/), [Thanos](https://github.com/improbable-eng/thanos), [Cortex](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex)?
### Does VictoriaMetrics use Prometheus technologies like other clustered TSDBs built on top of Prometheus such as [M3 from Uber](https://eng.uber.com/m3/), [Thanos](https://github.com/thanos-io/thanos), [Cortex](https://github.com/cortexproject/cortex)?
No. VictoriaMetrics core is written in Go from scratch by [fasthttp](https://github.com/valyala/fasthttp) [author](https://github.com/valyala).
The architecture is [optimized for storing and querying large amounts of time series data with high cardinality](https://medium.com/devopslinks/victoriametrics-creating-the-best-remote-storage-for-prometheus-5d92d66787ac). VictoriaMetrics storage uses [certain ideas from ClickHouse](https://medium.com/@valyala/how-victoriametrics-makes-instant-snapshots-for-multi-terabyte-time-series-data-e1f3fb0e0282). Special thanks to [Alexey Milovidov](https://github.com/alexey-milovidov).
### Are there performance comparisons with other solutions?
Yes: