Newly added index entries can be missing after unclean shutdown, since they didn't flush to persistent storage yet.
Log about this and delete the corresponding metricID, so it could be re-created next time.
This should reduce the frequency of the following errors:
cannot find tag filter matching less than N time series; either increase -search.maxUniqueTimeseries or use more specific tag filters
more than N time series found on the time range [...]; either increase -search.maxUniqueTimeseries or shrink the time range
This case is possible when the corresponding metricID->metricName entry didn't propagate to inverted index yet.
This should fix the following error:
error when searching tsids for tfss [...]: cannot find metricName by metricID 1582417212213420669: EOF
- Sort tag filters in the ascending number of matching time series
in order to apply the most specific filters first.
- Fall back to metricName search for filters matching big number of time series
(usually this are negative filters or regexp filters).
The metricID->metricName entry can be missing in the indexdb after unclean shutdown
when only a part of entries for new time series is written into indexdb.
Recover from such a situation by removing the broken metricID. New metricID
will be automatically created for time series with the given metricName
when new data point will arive to it.
Production workload shows that the index requires ~4Kb of RAM per active time series.
This is too much for high number of active time series, so let's delete this index.
Now the queries should fall back to the index for the current day instead of the index
for the recent hour. The query performance for the current day index should be good enough
given the 100M rows/sec scan speed per CPU core.
The origin of the error has been detected and documented in the code,
so it is enough to export a counter for such errors at `vm_index_blocks_with_metric_ids_incorrect_order_total`,
so it could be monitored and alerted on high error rates.
Export also the counter for processed index blocks with metricIDs - `vm_index_blocks_with_metric_ids_processed_total`,
so its' rate could be compared to `rate(vm_index_blocks_with_metric_ids_incorrect_order_total)`.
Slow loops could require seeks and expensive regexp matching, while fast loops just scans
all the metricIDs for the given `tag=value` prefix. So these operations must have separate
max loops multiplier.
The fastest tag filters are non-negative non-regexp, since they are the most specific.
The slowest tag filters are negative regexp, since they require scanning
all the entries for the given label.
This should improve inverted index search performance for filters matching big number of time series,
since `lib/uint64set.Set` is faster than `map[uint64]struct{}` for both `Add` and `Has` calls.
See the corresponding benchmarks in `lib/uint64set`.
