The lifetime of storageBlock is much shorter comparing to the lifetime of inmemoryPart,
so sync.Pool usage should reduce overall memory usage and improve performance
because of better locality of reference when marshaling inmemoryBlock to inmemoryPart.
https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/issues/2247
This should reduce memory usage on systems with big number of CPU cores,
since every inmemoryPart object occupies at least 64KB of memory and sync.Pool maintains
a separate pool inmemoryPart objects per each CPU core.
Though the new scheme for the pool worsens per-cpu cache locality, this should be amortized
by big sizes of inmemoryPart objects.
