mirror of
https://github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics.git
synced 2024-12-15 16:30:55 +01:00
ab10178c85
* vmalert: split alert's `Start` field into `ActiveAt` and `Start` The `ActiveAt` field identifies when alert becomes active for rules with `for > 0`. Previously, this value was stored in field `Start`. The field `Start` now identifies the moment alert became `FIRING`. The split is needed in order to distinguish these two moments in the API responses for alerts. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: support specific moment of time for rules evaluation The Querier interface was extended to accept a new argument used as a timestamp at which evaluation should be made. It is needed to align rules execution time within the group. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: mark disappeared series as stale Series generated by alerting rules, which were sent to remote write now will be marked as stale if they will disappear on the next evaluation. This would make ALERTS and ALERTS_FOR_TIME series more precise. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * wip Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: evaluate rules at fixed timestamp Before, time at which rules were evaluated was calculated right before rule execution. The change makes sure that timestamp is calculated only once per evalution round and all rules are using the same timestamp. It also updates the logic of resending of already resolved alert notification. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: allow overridin `alertname` label value if it is present in response Previously, `alertname` was always equal to the Alerting Rule name. Now, its value can be overriden if series in response containt the different value for this label. The change is needed for improving compatibility with Prometheus. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: align rules evaluation in time Now, evaluation timestamp for rules evaluates as if there was no delay in rules evaluation. It means, that rules will be evaluated at fixed timestamps+group_interval. This way provides more consistent evaluation results and improves compatibility with Prometheus, Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: add metric for missed iterations New metric `vmalert_iteration_missed_total` will show whether rules evaluation round was missed. Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: reduce delay before the initial rule evaluation in group Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: rollback alertname override According to the spec: ``` The alert name from the alerting rule (HighRequestLatency from the example above) MUST be added to the labels of the alert with the label name as alertname. It MUST override any existing alertname label. ``` https://github.com/prometheus/compliance/blob/main/alert_generator/specification.md#step-3 Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: throw err immediately on dedup detection ``` The execution of an alerting rule MUST error out immediately and MUST NOT send any alerts or add samples to samples receiver if there is more than one alert with the same labels ``` https://github.com/prometheus/compliance/blob/main/alert_generator/specification.md#step-4 Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: cleanup Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com> * vmalert: use strings builder to reduce allocs Signed-off-by: hagen1778 <roman@victoriametrics.com>
279 lines
7.4 KiB
Go
279 lines
7.4 KiB
Go
package main
|
|
|
|
import (
|
|
"context"
|
|
"fmt"
|
|
"reflect"
|
|
"sort"
|
|
"sync"
|
|
"testing"
|
|
"time"
|
|
|
|
"github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/app/vmalert/datasource"
|
|
"github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/app/vmalert/notifier"
|
|
"github.com/VictoriaMetrics/VictoriaMetrics/lib/prompbmarshal"
|
|
)
|
|
|
|
type fakeQuerier struct {
|
|
sync.Mutex
|
|
metrics []datasource.Metric
|
|
err error
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) setErr(err error) {
|
|
fq.Lock()
|
|
fq.err = err
|
|
fq.Unlock()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) reset() {
|
|
fq.Lock()
|
|
fq.err = nil
|
|
fq.metrics = fq.metrics[:0]
|
|
fq.Unlock()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) add(metrics ...datasource.Metric) {
|
|
fq.Lock()
|
|
fq.metrics = append(fq.metrics, metrics...)
|
|
fq.Unlock()
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) BuildWithParams(_ datasource.QuerierParams) datasource.Querier {
|
|
return fq
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) QueryRange(ctx context.Context, q string, _, _ time.Time) ([]datasource.Metric, error) {
|
|
return fq.Query(ctx, q, time.Now())
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fq *fakeQuerier) Query(_ context.Context, _ string, _ time.Time) ([]datasource.Metric, error) {
|
|
fq.Lock()
|
|
defer fq.Unlock()
|
|
if fq.err != nil {
|
|
return nil, fq.err
|
|
}
|
|
cp := make([]datasource.Metric, len(fq.metrics))
|
|
copy(cp, fq.metrics)
|
|
return cp, nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
type fakeNotifier struct {
|
|
sync.Mutex
|
|
alerts []notifier.Alert
|
|
// records number of received alerts in total
|
|
counter int
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (*fakeNotifier) Close() {}
|
|
func (*fakeNotifier) Addr() string { return "" }
|
|
func (fn *fakeNotifier) Send(_ context.Context, alerts []notifier.Alert) error {
|
|
fn.Lock()
|
|
defer fn.Unlock()
|
|
fn.counter += len(alerts)
|
|
fn.alerts = alerts
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fn *fakeNotifier) getCounter() int {
|
|
fn.Lock()
|
|
defer fn.Unlock()
|
|
return fn.counter
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func (fn *fakeNotifier) getAlerts() []notifier.Alert {
|
|
fn.Lock()
|
|
defer fn.Unlock()
|
|
return fn.alerts
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func metricWithValueAndLabels(t *testing.T, value float64, labels ...string) datasource.Metric {
|
|
return metricWithValuesAndLabels(t, []float64{value}, labels...)
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func metricWithValuesAndLabels(t *testing.T, values []float64, labels ...string) datasource.Metric {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
m := metricWithLabels(t, labels...)
|
|
m.Values = values
|
|
for i := range values {
|
|
m.Timestamps = append(m.Timestamps, int64(i))
|
|
}
|
|
return m
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func metricWithLabels(t *testing.T, labels ...string) datasource.Metric {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if len(labels) == 0 || len(labels)%2 != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to get even number of labels")
|
|
}
|
|
m := datasource.Metric{Values: []float64{1}, Timestamps: []int64{1}}
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(labels); i += 2 {
|
|
m.Labels = append(m.Labels, datasource.Label{
|
|
Name: labels[i],
|
|
Value: labels[i+1],
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
return m
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func toPromLabels(t *testing.T, labels ...string) []prompbmarshal.Label {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if len(labels) == 0 || len(labels)%2 != 0 {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to get even number of labels")
|
|
}
|
|
var ls []prompbmarshal.Label
|
|
for i := 0; i < len(labels); i += 2 {
|
|
ls = append(ls, prompbmarshal.Label{
|
|
Name: labels[i],
|
|
Value: labels[i+1],
|
|
})
|
|
}
|
|
return ls
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareGroups(t *testing.T, a, b *Group) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if a.Name != b.Name {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected group name %q; got %q", a.Name, b.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.File != b.File {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected group %q file name %q; got %q", a.Name, a.File, b.File)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.Interval != b.Interval {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected group %q interval %v; got %v", a.Name, a.Interval, b.Interval)
|
|
}
|
|
if len(a.Rules) != len(b.Rules) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected group %s to have %d rules; got: %d",
|
|
a.Name, len(a.Rules), len(b.Rules))
|
|
}
|
|
for i, r := range a.Rules {
|
|
got, want := r, b.Rules[i]
|
|
if a.ID() != b.ID() {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to have rule %q; got %q", want.ID(), got.ID())
|
|
}
|
|
if err := compareRules(t, want, got); err != nil {
|
|
t.Fatalf("comparsion error: %s", err)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareRules(t *testing.T, a, b Rule) error {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
switch v := a.(type) {
|
|
case *AlertingRule:
|
|
br, ok := b.(*AlertingRule)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("rule %q supposed to be of type AlertingRule", b.ID())
|
|
}
|
|
return compareAlertingRules(t, v, br)
|
|
case *RecordingRule:
|
|
br, ok := b.(*RecordingRule)
|
|
if !ok {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("rule %q supposed to be of type RecordingRule", b.ID())
|
|
}
|
|
return compareRecordingRules(t, v, br)
|
|
default:
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("unexpected rule type received %T", a)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareRecordingRules(t *testing.T, a, b *RecordingRule) error {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if a.Expr != b.Expr {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have expression %q; got %q", a.Expr, b.Expr)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(a.Labels, b.Labels) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have labels %#v; got %#v", a.Labels, b.Labels)
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareAlertingRules(t *testing.T, a, b *AlertingRule) error {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if a.Expr != b.Expr {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have expression %q; got %q", a.Expr, b.Expr)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.For != b.For {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have for %q; got %q", a.For, b.For)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(a.Annotations, b.Annotations) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have annotations %#v; got %#v", a.Annotations, b.Annotations)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(a.Labels, b.Labels) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have labels %#v; got %#v", a.Labels, b.Labels)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.Type.String() != b.Type.String() {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected to have Type %#v; got %#v", a.Type.String(), b.Type.String())
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareTimeSeries(t *testing.T, a, b []prompbmarshal.TimeSeries) error {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if len(a) != len(b) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected number of timeseries %d; got %d", len(a), len(b))
|
|
}
|
|
for i := range a {
|
|
expTS, gotTS := a[i], b[i]
|
|
if len(expTS.Samples) != len(gotTS.Samples) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected number of samples %d; got %d", len(expTS.Samples), len(gotTS.Samples))
|
|
}
|
|
for i, exp := range expTS.Samples {
|
|
got := gotTS.Samples[i]
|
|
if got.Value != exp.Value {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected value %.2f; got %.2f", exp.Value, got.Value)
|
|
}
|
|
// timestamp validation isn't always correct for now.
|
|
// this must be improved with time mock.
|
|
/*if got.Timestamp != exp.Timestamp {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected timestamp %d; got %d", exp.Timestamp, got.Timestamp)
|
|
}*/
|
|
}
|
|
if len(expTS.Labels) != len(gotTS.Labels) {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected number of labels %d (%v); got %d (%v)",
|
|
len(expTS.Labels), expTS.Labels, len(gotTS.Labels), gotTS.Labels)
|
|
}
|
|
for i, exp := range expTS.Labels {
|
|
got := gotTS.Labels[i]
|
|
if got.Name != exp.Name {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected label name %q; got %q", exp.Name, got.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
if got.Value != exp.Value {
|
|
return fmt.Errorf("expected label value %q; got %q", exp.Value, got.Value)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
return nil
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
func compareAlerts(t *testing.T, as, bs []notifier.Alert) {
|
|
t.Helper()
|
|
if len(as) != len(bs) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to have length %d; got %d", len(as), len(bs))
|
|
}
|
|
sort.Slice(as, func(i, j int) bool {
|
|
return as[i].ID < as[j].ID
|
|
})
|
|
sort.Slice(bs, func(i, j int) bool {
|
|
return bs[i].ID < bs[j].ID
|
|
})
|
|
for i := range as {
|
|
a, b := as[i], bs[i]
|
|
if a.Name != b.Name {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected t have Name %q; got %q", a.Name, b.Name)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.State != b.State {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected t have State %q; got %q", a.State, b.State)
|
|
}
|
|
if a.Value != b.Value {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected t have Value %f; got %f", a.Value, b.Value)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(a.Annotations, b.Annotations) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to have annotations %#v; got %#v", a.Annotations, b.Annotations)
|
|
}
|
|
if !reflect.DeepEqual(a.Labels, b.Labels) {
|
|
t.Fatalf("expected to have labels %#v; got %#v", a.Labels, b.Labels)
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|